This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
[[Ferdinand Marcos#Martial law and the New Society|martial law]] The anchor (#Martial law and the New Society) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors
I don't know if some here are aware of the meaning of "prominent". "Prominent" and "competent" or "professional" or "experienced" are not synonyms. --Bone1234 (talk) 02:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, "prominent" in this context meant "leading, important, or well-known" - all of which describe Mr. Buenaventura as a banker prior to his appointment as Governor. He could very well have been a low-profile crony until said appointment made him prominent, but he was not. Hence the use of the term is not redundant. Besides, last time I checked, notability was the standard for Wikipedia inclusion (WP:N), not prominence; it is not automatically the case that someone is prominent simply because they are notable. -Wormcast (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Your talk doesn't really have any sense, but in my observation... Bone1234 (talk) 04:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]