Talk:Rajiv Gandhi International Airport/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Music1201 (talk · contribs) 23:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Overall, the article generally meets the GA criteria, although I am not passing this nomination until the issue with the "Ownership", "Runways", "Terminal", and "Expansion" sections of this article be expanded to meet criterions 1b and 3b.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The "Ownership", "Runways", "Terminal", and "Expansion" sections of the article should be expanded to meet criterion 1b.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   As I mentioned in criterion 1b, the "Ownership", "Runways", "Terminal", and "Expansion" are not focused enough on the topic to meet criterion 3b.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Status:  Done: This article now meets the good article criteria and has been promoted.

@Music1201: Hi thanks for picking this up. I retitled the "Runway" section as "Airfield" to encompass more info. I also expanded on the "Terminal" section. I added more info to the "Expansion" section and moved it to the bottom of the article under the title "Future plans", in line with WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. However I'm not sure how to expand on the "Ownership" section. The basics are contained in that section, while the history is located in the third paragraph of the "History" section. - ✈Sunnya343✈ (talk) 22:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

@Sunnya343: After looking at the expanded sections, I'm glad to say this article meets the good article criteria. Thanks for expanding. — Music1201 ^talk 02:33, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

@Music1201: Thanks for the review! - ✈Sunnya343✈ (talk) 02:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)