Talk:Ram Sewak Sharma
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Adding factual details to improve the quality
[edit]Hi @Naushervan,
- The Empowered Group on Vaccine Administration for COVID-19 (EGVAC ) is a separate committee which was formed on 8th January 2021 and the National Expert Group on Vaccine Administration for COVID-19 (NEGVAC) is separate and met on 12th August, 2020.
- Why we need to mention Dr Sharma is the Chairperson of the EGVAC in the lead is because this was a separate role and not something related to NHA.
- In fact, the date of his appointment as CEO NHA is incorrect. He was appointed the CEO of NHA on 1st February, 2021 which I have updated for now.
Pr1311 (talk) 09:18, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but you did not add in a separate section, you placed it in the lead with inaccurate wording. If you want to add it in as a fourth section under the heading Career, then feel free to do so with an appropriate heading, and if you're updating the lead, please make sure that you follow the guidelines for lead sections, which I have already informed you about. I want to point out that you've had this conversation on your talk page, at the teahouse, and now here again, for the third time. At this point it's hard to see what you're aiming to achieve, and why you're repeatedly tagging me. You now know the Wiki guidelines on how to edit: please follow them. - Naushervan (talk) 09:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- I will update it.
- Since you reversed my edits the first time on the pretext of puffery language, I again attempted to include the factual details by using direct sentences. You again reversed my changes and wrote incorrect facts. You also dropped a message on my talk page to which I replied and then you raised the point of why I am not having a conversation on the page that I was making edits to. Therefore, I tagged you here.
- I went to TeaHouse because I am attempting to improve the page with factual details and trying to enrich it by adding the missing information. I didn't hear back from you so I wanted to seek help there. Anyway, I hope things are clear now. I am happy to learn and my aim is to contribute while making sure I follow ethics and rules of editing articles in Wikipedia. Thanks. Pr1311 (talk) 06:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but you did not add in a separate section, you placed it in the lead with inaccurate wording. If you want to add it in as a fourth section under the heading Career, then feel free to do so with an appropriate heading, and if you're updating the lead, please make sure that you follow the guidelines for lead sections, which I have already informed you about. I want to point out that you've had this conversation on your talk page, at the teahouse, and now here again, for the third time. At this point it's hard to see what you're aiming to achieve, and why you're repeatedly tagging me. You now know the Wiki guidelines on how to edit: please follow them. - Naushervan (talk) 09:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)