Philosophy: Logic / Medieval Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Medieval philosophy

What is it?[edit]

No clear, concise definition of Ramism anywhere in the article. Presumes (and requires) prior knowledge of the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.247.0 (talk) 03:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Rainolds[edit]

Although he was sympathetic toward Ramus for religious reasons, Rainolds was not a representative English Ramist. In fact, he gave lectures on Aristotelian rhetoric and dialectic and viewed those subjects quite differently than did Ramus. -- Chironomia (talk) 07:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he's now mentioned in the "Opposition" section, as in two minds. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I read that. That section is really taking shape. -- Chironomia (talk) 13:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

tense[edit]

I really didn't read into this too much, but shouldn't the lede begin "Ramism is a collection of theories..."? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 02:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No more Ramists post-1650, really. Charles Matthews (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What *is* it?[edit]

John Rainolds[edit]

tense[edit]

What is it?[edit]