Talk:Ramism
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
What *is* it?
[edit]No clear, concise definition of Ramism anywhere in the article. Presumes (and requires) prior knowledge of the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.247.0 (talk) 03:06, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
John Rainolds
[edit]Although he was sympathetic toward Ramus for religious reasons, Rainolds was not a representative English Ramist. In fact, he gave lectures on Aristotelian rhetoric and dialectic and viewed those subjects quite differently than did Ramus. -- Chironomia (talk) 07:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, he's now mentioned in the "Opposition" section, as in two minds. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:52, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- I read that. That section is really taking shape. -- Chironomia (talk) 13:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
tense
[edit]I really didn't read into this too much, but shouldn't the lede begin "Ramism is a collection of theories..."? — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- No more Ramists post-1650, really. Charles Matthews (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)