Talk:Ramos v. Louisiana
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sources
[edit]Here are some sources that might be of use:
- https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/20/politics/scotus-jury-verdict-criminal-trial/index.html
- https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/493653-supreme-court-rules-non-unanimous-jury-verdicts-unconstitutional
- https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/supreme-court-ends-unanimous-jury-convictions-overturning-precedent/story?id=70242862
- https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ramos-v-louisiana/
- https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/20/supreme-court-rules-jury-verdict-must-be-unanimous/
--Posted by Pikamander2 (Talk) at 17:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
14th Amendment
[edit]@Masem: Should we list the 14th Amendment in the infobox's "Laws applied" section, in addition to the 6th, since this deals with incorporation, or only the 6th as it already does? --1990'sguy (talk) 22:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- I think in needs to, when reading the majority opinion as it talks heavily of incorporation. Let's put it this way: it can't hurt to have it there. --Masem (t) 22:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
retroactivity still at issue
[edit]the ramos decision did not resolve whether it is retroactive.
scotus has granted cert to answer that question, but not yet heard argument or issued a decision. article should be updated with more info, by someone who knows more than i do.
see also https://old.reddit.com/r/scotus/comments/iajvo5/reposted_louisiana_111_murder_conviction_upheld/
47.248.134.91 (talk) 09:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)gtbear at gmail
- Done. --Wdougs (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)