Jump to content

Talk:Ranchlander National Bank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk01:23, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 18:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • New, long article about a fascinating story. Good sources, neutral point of view and no copyright issues I could find. All the hooks are short, interesting and supported by sources in the article. A QPQ review has been provided, but it has already been used in another nomination. As I read the rules, a review can't be used twice just because it's for a multi-article nomination. The rules make a distinction between nominations and articles ("If the nomination is for multiple articles...") and says you need to review a nomination for each bolded article in your own hook. If I have misunderstood this and there is a clarification about it somewhere, please let me know and I'll approve the nomination, which otherwise looks great. If not, you need another review. Ffranc (talk) 11:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, from memory, that is how it's supposed to work - though I'm surprised it apparently isn't clarified in the rules. To do otherwise would mean there would be no incentive for anybody to review multis, as they would have to review multiple nominations for no additional benefit. Gatoclass (talk) 01:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, seems I was wrong. I found the original discussion that lead to the implementation of the multi-QPQ requirement, and the main issue was how laborous it was to check each article when people posted massive multi-noms. Then it makes sense to base QPQ on the number of checked articles, not the number of nominations they appear in. Everything is good then. Ffranc (talk) 09:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The rules have been updated for next time, too, so this should hopefully be the last time we have this question seriously. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (she/they) 02:03, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]