Jump to content

Talk:Rancho Camulos/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I fixed two dead links. However a number of important statemnets are unreferenced, I have tagged them. All sources appear reliable.
    Done. howcheng {chat} 00:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Some referencing issues to be fixed, on hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    OK, everything alright now. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]