Talk:Randecker Maar Research Station

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Randecker Maar Research Station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 6 December 2020 by reviewer Curbon7 (talk · contribs).

Birds Low‑importance

Randecker Maar Research Station is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sockpuppeting[edit]

FYI, it looks like the majority of this article's start was through sockpuppeting: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phillip Mandeville. It's not clear if there was a WP:COI aspect or not. Kingofaces43 (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Restore deletion of sourced material[edit]

I restored the sourced material with this edit summary:

restore to last stable version moved to main space by Curbon7 on 11:38, 6 December 2020 and modified by John B123 on 13:50, 6 December 2020 before large scale deletion of sourced material.

Deletions of sourced material performed by Kingofaces43. --David Tornheim (talk) 05:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing absolutely no attempt at satisfying WP:ONUS or establishing consensus for specific edits as requested per policy multiple times here, I've undone the attempt at restoring the unsourced and malformed edits originally made by the sockpuppets among all the other issues that were detailed in previous edit summaries. Dealing with the sockpuppets was disruptive enough, so no one should be blanket restoring all the previous issues they were edit warring in. David's revert also undid all the intervening edits from other editors and other copy edits.

If anyone does have any additional edits to make in addition to the baseline established after the sockpuppet cleanup[1], then that should be done piecemeal based on specific sources. The third-party source tag was especially added for that reason to avoid some of the previous promotional issues they were introducing when they created this article. At this point though, no one should be reinserting disputed content en masse given the state of the page history. Kingofaces43 (talk) 01:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]