Talk:Randy Blythe manslaughter case/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 03:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting a review of this article. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 03:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review discussion[edit]

GA criteria final checklist[edit]

Well-written

Meets this criteria. Possibly it is a bit too detailed, and could benefit from a bit more summarization. Also the quotes separated out and with the large quote marks are common in journalism, but uncommon with Wikipedia (possibly discouraged?) But these are possible suggestions for further improvement rather than being such to affect passage as a Good Article. North8000 (talk) 01:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 01:55, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Meets this criteria. Has 10 images. None are non-free, so no article-specific use rationales are required. North8000 (talk) 03:09, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Result[edit]

Congratulaitons. This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. What an immense amout of nice and thorough work! Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 01:59, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Reviewer[reply]