Jump to content

Talk:Raphael Semmes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Admiral Chekov

[edit]

Maybe I'm nitpicking, but as I understand it, in the U.S. in the 1860s, the rank of admiral didn't exist. It was "flag officer". Trekphiler 13:16, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, not nitpicking, just wrong. The rank was created early in the war.--172.191.0.44 (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the sake of clarification (and in the interest of being less bitchy than I was above), I believe the rank of Rear Admiral was created early on during the Civil War, while the rank of Admiral (that is, "full" Admiral) was indeed a post-War creation. I get in moods. Syphilis eats the brain, you know.--172.190.34.136 (talk) 06:23, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- DUH the ship off galveston was a SIDE wheeler! typical wikipedia Leave out ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.173.206.159 (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Arne Saknussemm

[edit]

I've removed the claims about the origins of Verne's character's name as a likely hoax. No other source I can find suggests anything of the sort. -- The Anome (talk) 00:29, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have now put in much more context to this claim and referenced it to the original website. Tranmere Robur (talk) 18:15, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

[edit]

@Tranmere Robur: There may be authors who have speculated that Semmes was an inspiration for Verne and Stevenson, and it’s fair to include a mention of their views. But well over half the article is devoted to original research seeking to prove those points. Every statement needs to be cited to one of those speculating authors, not to details from novels and memoirs. 108.31.0.164 (talk) 05:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh god yes, this article is really bad. Refer to WP:SYNTH. You can't just cite one fact, cite another fact, and then write a claim asserting a connection. You need to cite the connection itself. Most of this article is just directly taken from Lamb and I'm either suspicious that it is written by Lamb himself, or it's a copyvio. In any case you should not base an entire article on this individual who probably doesn't pass the reliable sources filter. Fangz (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]