Talk:Rashtriya Khel Protsahan Puruskar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Roller26 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:14, 15 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • @Yoninah:, I am not asking for any leniency, though its understandable for a first-time nominator. I thought that the 7 day rule, was pretty stone set until I chanced upon the D9 criteria in the Supplementary guidelines, which doesn't mention a first-time nominator. As I have mentioned in the comment above that I have added the List of Tenzing Norgay National Adventure Award recipients later after the nomination and it can be not allowed by a reviewer or promoter. I just included it as it makes the hook a little more interesting. Also I am not experienced enough to understand what "large backlog of hooks" as mentioned in D9 truly means. But seeing as we are only running on 1 set of hooks per day and also that very few hooks haven't been reviewed atleast once in the nominations section, I felt that currently we don't seem to have a case of "large backlog of hooks". However the final decision to include or not include it, lies with you and any other senior contributor. Roller26 (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Honestly, I have no idea what D9 is doing there, especially if it could be argued that an 18-day-old article qualifies because we have a backlog of unreviewed hooks. I'd like to bring this up at WT:DYK. Yoninah (talk) 17:17, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • These three articles are new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the articles are neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Three QPQs have been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:43, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yoninah:, I have done all the changes. However I think that the phrase "annual Indian sports awards" is grammatically correct. Roller26 (talk) 19:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. Restoring tick per Cwmhiraeth's review. Yoninah (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 November 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 18:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Rashtriya Khel Protsahan PuruskarRashtriya Khel Protsahan Puraskar – Spelling correction. — Hemant Dabral (📞) 07:08, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Hemant Dabral and TheAafi: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • But there are reliable sources like this which name the award as "Rashtriya Khel Protsahan Puruskar", and I don't know if would need a correction? It is just a different spelling. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:47, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: As the creator of the page, I had done some research before naming the page. While both spellings have been used, the current "Puruskar" is not only used more often, it is also used in all the major official pages for this award including all the sources given in the page. Roller26 (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Puru is the more commonly used spelling. Roller26 has explained it better and I agree with him.--Walrus Ji (talk) 14:28, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.