Talk:Rational Automation Framework

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 November 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rational Automation Framework redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted on 4 July 2012 by reviewer Callanecc (talk · contribs).

Neutrality[edit]

I would just like to point out that Wikipedia does not prohibit people with a connection to the subject matter writing articles. I have done my best to make this article neutral in tone and exclude any kind of marketing-oriented language. If anyone has concerns about the neutrality of the article, please bring them up here and I will be happy to address them. Lshiner (talk) 13:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is basically good, but not immune to criticism. The tag merely encourages other editors to improve the page, but it also specifies the Talk page has specific actionable items to address it, which isn't actually true. A few areas that caught my attention:

"increasingly important"
The heavy use of vendor sources (4-7)
Instead of "providing..." can we say what it is?
It's not bad, but a little heavy on the features without a lot of content on its history and context
At a glance the external links look pretty heavy

It's a good article, but the tag just encourages readers to improve on it. While you're under no obligation to do so, if you wanted to improve it yourself you could provide an alternative version in a sandbox and use the {{request edit}} tool. User:King4057 17:00, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]