Jump to content

Talk:Ratu (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleRatu (band) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 4, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 31, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the ringback tone for the Indonesian music duo Ratu's song about friends with benefits was downloaded more than a million times?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ratu (band)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 18:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting read. Prose is good and what helps is the article is well sourced. So kudos.

General

  • No problems with sourcing, nor the reliabity.
  • No issues with imaging.
  • No dead links
  • One dablink needs addressing
  • Is it acceptable to use a YouTube link as a External link, per WP:YT and WP:EL

Lead

  • "The group was dissolved permanently in 2007" 'was' is redundant, perfectly fine to remove it.
  • "they were the first artist" as far as I'm aware of, artist refers to one person, should be artists, per plural

Career

  • "Maia decided to form a duo, a singer and a musician" replace comma with colon
  • "This situations was exacerbated" → This situation was exacerbated

Later activities

  • "and by 2011 Korean-inspired boy and girl bands had become dominant" place comma between '2011' and 'Korean-inspired'

On hold. Lemonade51 (talk) 19:35, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dab dealt with. RatuVEVO is an official feed, so there are no copyright concerns; should be acceptable.
Was removed, artist changed to musical act (allow the inclusion of solo artists as well), changed to "consisting of", oops, and done.
Thanks for the review! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:33, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]