Talk:Rayburn House Office Building

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rayburn House Office Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150414072537/http://thehill.com/capital-living/24170-letting-off-steam-at-the-range to http://thehill.com/capital-living/24170-letting-off-steam-at-the-range

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rayburn House Office Building/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

The section on the gym has some issues. I'm pretty sure that there's no swimming pool there, or ball courts. Also, it's in a very, very, very isolated section of Rayburn (basically between two levels of the parking garage) so I'm fairly confident that virtually no visitors pass by it. Also, it's clearly labeled as a gym, so if they did pass by it, they'd immediately know exactly what it was.

Given that I work in a house office building, I'm a biased source on this, and therefor not comfortable deleting the bad info... I don't want to minimize the fair point that there is a gym there that most people don't know about, and might object to. However, given that there's no references for the commentary about it, perhaps someone who's further removed from this would look into it, and delete the bad info.

OK, I'm back, and I found some info online. So, i'm going to make some basic edits and attempt to correctly source them. I'm new at editing, so bare with me, and feel free to correct my work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.92.146.121 (talk) 00:04, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 00:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 03:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)