Jump to content

Talk:Raymond W. Bliss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleRaymond W. Bliss was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 9, 2020Good article nomineeListed
February 26, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 4, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that General Raymond W. Bliss opened the United States Army's first radioactive-isotope laboratory in 1949?
Current status: Delisted good article


Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk06:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Army's first radioactive isotope laboratory
Army's first radioactive isotope laboratory

* ... that in 1949 the U.S. Army’s first radioactive isotope laboratory (pictured) was opened by General Raymond W. Bliss?

Source 1 - "The Army’s first radioactive isotope laboratory was opened officially on March 4 at the Army Medical Center by Major General Raymond W. Bliss, Surgeon General of the Army." (page 220)
Source 2 - This, the first isotope laboratory in any Army installation, was inaugurated on March 4 in a ceremony in which Major General Raymond W. Bliss, the Surgeon General officiated, (page 312)
Source 3 - A new laboratory for the study of radioactive isotopes at the Army Medical Department Research and Graduate School Washington DC was officially opened on 4 March (page 425)

Created by Doug Coldwell (talk). Self-nominated at 11:56, 17 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: I have tweaked the hook to specify the army and added the italics to (pictured), but otherwise everything checks out. A nice article and a decent hook. It would be nice if this hook could be run on March 4th. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Raymond W. Bliss/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 21:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


  • "was a senior United States Army officer of various ranks from Lieutenant to Major General" 1. He can't have been a senior officer while a lieutenant. If you want to retain that formulation, you need to lose "senior". 2. Lower case l, m and g, per MOS:JOBTITLES; and for consistency with elsewhere in the article.
  • Is there some link for "Indian station"?
  • Are you/your sources claiming that from August 1920 to September 1921 Bliss both learnt surgery and taught medical procedures?
It will.
  • "He was the commanding officer of Fort Sill hospital in Oklahoma in 1941. He was in London, England, during the German air raids from the fall of 1940 to the winter of 1941 as a military observer and medical correspondent." 1. The sentences seem out of chronological order. 2. Does that mean that he was CO of a hospital he never visited? 3. By "winter" do you mean the early part of the year? If so, MOS:SEASON suggests that one "avoid the use of seasons to refer to a particular time of year ([eg] winter 1995)" - replace with the actual month.
Good. I have given it a further tweak. See what you think.
  • "In August 1944, Bliss was Assistant Surgeon General until he was promoted to Deputy Surgeon General in January 1946" Lower case in the titles.
  • "He was at that time endorsed to the rank of Major General" 1. "endorsed is an odd usage; maybe just 'promoted'? 2. Lower case m and g.
  • "Bliss had toured Korea in October 1950" Why the switch to past tense? Suggest deleting "had".
  • "Medevac" - lower case m.
  • "with the result that death rates were lower compared to World War I and World War II, with improved recovery rates." What is the difference between a lower death rate and an improved recovery rate?

More to follow. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Thanks for starting GA review. I'll start working on the improvements today. --Doug Coldwell (talk) 11:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • "The first projects the atomic researchers did involved" Maybe "did" → 'carried out'?
  • Wikipedia is funny about lists. You can about get away with his awards and qualifications in list form, but offices and activities need to be in prose - eg "Helped establish the Tripler Army Medical Center in Honolulu, Hawaii"; "Surgeon General of U. S. Army"; "Raymond W Bliss Army Health Center at Ft Huachuca, Arizona, named after him."; "Oscar for Documentary Short Subject at the 21st Academy Awards for the film Toward Independence, June 1949".
  • I have done a little copy editing. Shout if you think I have messed anything up. = looks O.K. to me.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can see several things in the list which could do with Wikilinking, eg Distinguished Service Medal.
Nice. I have moved some of the sections around. Feel free to revert if you don't like.

More to follow. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:33, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick work, and good. To my eye, that meets the criteria. A nice little article. Good work. Promoting Gog the Mild (talk) 20:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

[edit]

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]