Talk:Red Auerbach

Red Auerbach was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 19, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
August 21, 2007	Good article reassessment	Delisted
August 28, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed
April 23, 2023	Good article reassessment	Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

College Basketball High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject College BasketballTemplate:WikiProject College Basketballcollege basketball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Basketball Association: Boston Celtics Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Basketball Association, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NBA on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Basketball AssociationWikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationTemplate:WikiProject National Basketball AssociationNBA articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Boston Celtics task force (assessed as Top-importance).

United States: District of Columbia / Boston High‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts - Boston (assessed as High-importance).

Jewish history Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Basketball

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject BasketballTemplate:WikiProject BasketballBasketball articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unverified?[edit]

What are the unverified claims or original research? --AW 22:59, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are no claims; it was added here [1] without comment. I shall remove.--Runcorn 22:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GAC in mind[edit]

I just rewrote the article, I want to make this a good article as if WP:WIAGA. —Onomatopoeia 06:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA[edit]

Congratulations!

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail: ¿SFGiДnts! ^{¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review!} 23:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

W0000t, thanks for the through analysis and the green plus! Onomatopoeia 19:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red overseas[edit]

I didn't see it mentioned, but Red brought players overseas in the off-season and ran camps that helped establish basketball as an international game. Many of the coaches who later led their national teams studied at those camps.

Sorry, no references. I just remember reading about it in newspaper articles years ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkinBoston (talk • contribs) 14:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA review concerns[edit]

I'm expressing my concerns regarding this GA review. I felt that this article has passed the review even though it didn't meet the standards. First, notes and reference section should be merged. Reference #6 and #10 have no sources! Where did you obtain the information from? This article needs more varieties of references than the existing ones. I also found File:RedMemshamrock.png lack of fair use rationales. Lead section should be summarized and shortened furthur. OhanaUnited ^{Talk page} 15:54, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed your concerns. Fair use is written, the refs straightened out, but plz explain what should be cut from the lead without violating WP:LEAD. —Onomatopoeia 11:58, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delisted GA[edit]

As my concerns are not addressed, the article will now be delisted. OhanaUnited ^{Talk page} 14:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this delisting came without messaging WP:NBA, main authors User:Onomatopoeia (me), User:Chensiyuan and others, or WP:GA/R. See also Wikipedia:Editor_review/OhanaUnited. —Onomatopoeia 12:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is now on WP:GA/R. Onomatopoeia 12:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Review[edit]

Article now in Good Article Review to appeal vs the GA retraction. Also it is a re-GAC. —Onomatopoeia 15:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I passed it, my one suggestion is that a good lead, as a summary, doesn't need a lot of refs.Sumoeagle179 02:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it should not have been delisted in the first place w/o notifying the main authors for copyedit first. —Onomatopoeia 11:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

US English, please[edit]

Please adhere to the fact that this an article about an American, so when editing, please use US English word spellings (i.e. honors as opposed to honours). --Jbossbarr 12:02 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Needs heavy rework[edit]

Here's an article that makes it clear the GA requirements have gotten much stricter over the years. It was passed as GA in 2007, but today would probably be an immediate fail. I'd list it for WP:GAR if that process wasn't a joke. Instead I'll just recommend that someone pick this up and either trim some unsourced content or add more sources. 15 inline citations for an article this size won't cut it. Statements like Few, if any, coaches can match Auerbach's record of wins and successful mentorship of his players, and most of the legacy section needs citations. I'm not that familiar with basketball history, but I know this guy is a huge icon, and it'd be a shame to see this article lose its GA status. Lizard (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Chensiyuan: Lizard (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

Red Auerbach[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: Delisted. 7 days have expired, no active work to improve the article to GA standards. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA from 2007. There's some uncited material and the legacy section is a mess. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pointing out this edit among other unreferenced additions. Pelmeen10 (talk) 21:43, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.