Jump to content

Talk:Red Hand Day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Child soldiers and anti-personnel mines?

[edit]

I deleted the last sentence of this article, as it was unreferenced.

Anti-personnel mines target everyone, children, adults, livestock, soldiers, civilians. They are bad because they are indiscriminate.

Conscripting child soldiers on the other hand is targeted (very discriminate) abuse of the most vulnerable members of society.

I have never heard of any link between the two. The only connection is that both may be used by people with no regard for human life, but that is pretty tenuous. Anti-personnel mines have been used in many wars, entirely independent of the presence or absence of child soldiers.

If someone wants to revert the delete, please cite a credible reference.--RandallC 13:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is POV it calls the use of teenagers in combat child abuse. This is an opinion not a fact70.150.94.194 (talk) 21:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyleft Alternative

[edit]

Public-domain alternative, without copyright, that have to be followed. It is intended for use in Internet forums. --Mjchael (talk) 11:29, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Red Hand Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]