Talk:Red Hand Defenders
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Signature
[edit]Aughavey 4 July 2005 21:58 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]This group is often mistaken with the Red Hand Commando
As far as I knew, REPUBLICAN Sinn Fein did not have offices in West Belfast, whoever wrote this article has gotten confused by Republican Sinn Fein, led by Ruari of Bradaigh, and Provisional Sinn Fein, led by Gerry Adams. Jim-ie 20:02, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Rosemary Nelson POV issues
[edit]Without joining into the debate about Northern Ireland, I think it is fair to say that it's misleading to describe Rosemary Nelson as a "Catholic human rights solicitor". She is a Catholic who is famous for defending Catholics who killed British soldiers, among others. Although she was killed for her work defending people, which may be a human rights issue, she was not a "human rights solicitor". This misleadingly paints her as 'the good guy' where instead she is a controversial figure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.28.40 (talk) 06:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
- I revered your changes, not for neutrality reasons but because "see discussion" isn't really part of the Wiki format. You bring up a good point though; we should find a more neutral term like "lawyer known for defending alleged Loyalist militants" or similar. A more balanced term like that, especially with a good footnote, would be a good refinement to the article. Thanks for pointing that out. MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:27, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Rosemary Nelson defended accused PIRA members; not loyalists. Think the term human rights solicitor is correct in that many of the accused PIRA members she defended she did so in an environment in which the UK has suspended most basic legal rights during that time and used rules of evidence that would not be, and were not in the UK proper, tolerated. Agree it should be noted she was not non-partisan in regards to the troubles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.49.186.132 (talk) 01:30, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- She is considered a Human Rights Lawyer by The Guardian [1] (A British Newspaper), A "Human RIghts Attorney" by the US house of Representatives [2], In Human Rights Firsts report[3] it makes reference to the fact that she represented both Protestant and Catholics, the American Bar Association also points out this fact[4], she is described as a Human Rights Lawyer by Six different Human Rights Organisations[5] including Amnesty International and also by Relatives for Justice [6] as well as the National Association of Criminal Defence Lawyers (US)[7]
- Other smaller groups referring to her as A Human Rights Lawyer include:
- Belfast Telegraph Newspaper[8]
- The Examiner Newspaper[9]
- The Washington Post Newspaper[10]
- New York City Bar (Lawyers Assoc)[11]
- London Evening Standard Newspaper[12]
- Boston Globe Newspaper[13]
- Democracy Now! organisation[14]
- Socialist Action Party[15]
- An Phoblacht Newspaper[16]
- British based Troops Out Movement[17]
- Defending Women - Defending Rights organisation[18]
Now to suggest she wasn't a human rigths lawyer is ridiculous and she represented people from both sides of the community.--86.44.33.51 (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
References
- ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/04/rosemary-nelson-murder-public-inquiry The Guardian
- ^ http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:viMGyftsfKAJ:chrissmith.house.gov/uploadedfiles/hres128.pdf+rosemary+nelson+human+rights&hl=en&gl=ie&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShbfD-ouIyIeHnQ5oiH6GHFdhBDsZ-cSoKYYTuWLB6FiUgWlAQtreivgwD8RmD2ZNxbBBjFiouz8Uv_-ELyH3p7McsSVtE2rU4eOjQpw6lxBw78BacDuSMXcgyRFWcA8uXW9mHT&sig=AHIEtbQOrdC12qn9SEqdTx5CZ8se-EzmDw US house of Representatives
- ^ http://www.humanrightsfirst.org/defenders/hrd_n_ireland/nelson_elisa_article.pdf Human Rights First report
- ^ http://www.faqs.org/abstracts/Social-sciences/Human-rights-hero-Lucas-Guttentag-International-human-rights-treaties-can-make-a-difference-US-imple.html
- ^ http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-58180438.html Six different Human Rights organisations
- ^ http://www.relativesforjustice.com/rosemary-nelson.htm Relatives for Justice
- ^ http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/newsreleases/99mn004?opendocument
- ^ http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/loyalist-mckeown-police-asked-me-to-shoot-rosemary-nelson-dead-13922418.html
- ^ http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer/1999/03/16/ihead.htm
- ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/nireland/stories/bomb031699.htm
- ^ http://www.nycbar.org/pdf/report/uploads/20071765-BriefHistoryofNYCBarWorkonNorthernIreland.pdf
- ^ http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-816845-man-held-over-rosemary-nelson-murder.do
- ^ http://www.boston.com/news/world/europe/articles/2007/03/12/an_irish_champion_of_human_rights/
- ^ http://i2.democracynow.org/1999/3/18/who_killed_rosemary_nelson
- ^ http://www.socialistaction.org/news/199904/mcaliskey.html
- ^ http://www.anphoblacht.com/news/detail/32333
- ^ http://www.troopsoutmovement.com/rosemarynelson.htm
- ^ http://www.defendingwomen-defendingrights.org/death_of_rosemarynelson.php
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Red Hand Defenders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303232754/http://www.patfinucanecentre.org/archive/sattacks/july01atta.html to http://www.patfinucanecentre.org/archive/sattacks/july01atta.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- C-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- C-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- C-Class Ireland articles
- Low-importance Ireland articles
- C-Class Ireland articles of Low-importance
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Ireland
- All WikiProject Ireland pages
- C-Class Northern Ireland-related articles
- Mid-importance Northern Ireland-related articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Northern Ireland
- All WikiProject Northern Ireland pages
- C-Class Terrorism articles
- Low-importance Terrorism articles
- WikiProject Terrorism articles