Talk:Red team/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Passed. ––FormalDude (talk) 15:04, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: FormalDude (talk · contribs) 10:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
All good.

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
MOS compliant.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):
Passes spot checks.

b. (citations to reliable sources):
All in-line citations are from reliable sources.

c. (OR):
Passes spot checks.

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
Found no copied or closely paraphrased text in the article.
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):
Addresses the main aspects of the topic.

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
No NPOV concerns.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Do not see any changing significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
One copyvio found, since removed.

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Appropriate and relevant.
Overall:
Pass/fail: ✓ Pass
Meets all 6 criteria, happy to pass. Thanks for your work Novem Linguae! ––FormalDude (talk) 14:55, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Comments[edit]

Starting the review soon. I will make comments here and update the progress above as we go. ––FormalDude (talk) 10:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Change who are responsible for defending networks and computers at an organization against attack → who are responsible for defending an organization's networks and computers at against attack Fixed
Not sure if the "types" section heading is needed. Fixed
wikilink digital security to Computer security Fixed
In fact, a role of the red team is to increase the skills of the blue team – Remove "In fact" Fixed
Red teams will typically have very good graph databases of their own organization – Replace "typically" with "usually" or a similar synonym to avoid repetition from the previous sentence. Fixed
I am of the opinion there are too many images of 9/11 in Wikipedia articles that only tangentially relate to the event. Fixed
Remove File:Medium Rucksack.jpg as a copyvio.
- Fixed. Sorry about that. The image had been on Commons for over a decade and was also verified by Flicker Bot, so I assumed it was okay. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It can sometimes be worthwhile to engage in "active defense" – why? Fixed
Unlike cybersecurity, which typically has many layers of security – reword to remove starting sentences consecutively with "Unlike cybersecurity" Fixed
A single vehicle rather than a convoy of vehicles, and a vehicle with exterior lights turned off, is less conspicuous. The use of red lights, for example red flashlights, can help reduce the visibility of lights. – missing inline citation and is a bit too close to WP:NOTHOWTO. Fixed
Red teaming is sometimes utilized by organizations outside the United States – Only sometimes? Is it not common outside the U.S.?
Overall seems to lack representation of a worldwide view of the subject. I'd like to see more countries covered if at all possible.
- To address these two bullets, I added information about the TIBER-EU framework, Israel's Ipcha Mistabra, and NATO. Please let me know if more non-United States examples are needed. –Novem Linguae (talk) 10:38, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For example, command-line interface (CLI) – duplicate wl and second appearance so it can use just the abbreviation. Fixed
tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) will be used – duplicate wl and second appearance so it can use just the abbreviation. Fixed
The United States Department of Defense (DoD) – duplicate wl and second appearance so it can use just the abbreviation. Fixed
Remove the following duplicate wikilinks: groupthink, board game, September 11 attacks, Central Intelligence Agency, Red Cell, United States Army, blue team, social engineering, Bluetooth, Transportation Security Administration, OPFOR. Fixed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.