Talk:Redflex Holdings
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I'm removing the paragraph that says this company is a fraud. Independent studies here in Albuquerque, based on actual Albuquerque traffic patterns, showed that they were indeed effective in cutting down on the frequency of moving violations and the frequency of accidents. With no link to any studies, leaving the offending paragraph isn't justified.
And no, I'm not affiliated with Redflex in any way. I ended up here when I was trying to figure out what the redflex charge on my credit card was. I'd paid a ticket and didn't recognize it on my statement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeblonite (talk • contribs) 05:38, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Chicago Parking Scandal
[edit]Someone recently blanked the section covering Redflex's bribery scandal in Chicago, IL. I have restored it. The section does not seem inflammatory or biased, and seems to be properly sourced.
The scandal is very real. It has been widely reported through legitimate news outlets. One has to wonder who would blank out this section without leaving notes of any kind on the talk page.
Signed: Username Emellis Date: 3/15/2013 2:03 PM CT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.28.176.172 (talk) 19:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- Start-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Start-Class Melbourne articles
- Low-importance Melbourne articles
- WikiProject Melbourne articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Start-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class Law enforcement articles
- Low-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles