Talk:Relaxation (physics)

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think the German version "Relaxationszeit" can be linked to this? xy (talk) 19:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amorphous solids

I intend to remove this section because it is of minor relevance to the topic (it confuses instead of clarifying things). If nobody has anything against, I will replace this section with what I consider the best example of characteristic/relaxation time: that of the RC circuit. Mgnelu (talk) 01:39, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Monomolecular first-order reversible reaction

This section needs substantial revision. 1) It contains too much math. 1a) since the A <-> B reaction is reversible, use forward and reverse rate constants:

${\ce {A->[k_{f}]B->[k_{r}]A}}$

2) It talks about "conservation of mass", although the molecular weights of A and B are not known, so these may be pseudo-reactions that do not conserve mass. It would be better to talk about conservation of particles, which the example clearly satisfies. 3) use the equals define sign instead of = when making a definition 4) a conclusion that connects the example with the concept of relaxation is needed.