Talk:René Descartes/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomcat7 (talk · contribs) 17:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Lead does not summarize the article properly
    Biography sections should be completely reformatted (the German version is a good model)
    Why is "Religious beliefs" in this section?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Many paragraphs are unreferenced
    A few questionable sources (primary mostly)
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    The lead alone tells me that the article is not neutral enough. Too many praises, etc.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Per the above issues: Not enough in-line citations in the biography section, odd structure, questionable sources--Tomcat (7) 17:36, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]