Talk:Renault Trucks

Trucks High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Land vehicles / European / French

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force

File:Damour57 1132335393 magnum440 001.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Damour57 1132335393 magnum440 001.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 3 September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:28, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Renault Trucks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:37, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Plans to spin off the Renault Trucks Defense page into an independent Arquus page[edit]

Plan to do this for RTD to Arquus since it's a new company that's a year old in France. There's already (at least) an independent French page. Ominae (talk) 01:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm I'd say I'm neutral on this. The French Wikipedia is really bad, eurocentric and full of inaccuracies. To top all that, its articles are poorly sourced, so I'd be careful. Having said that, I think it might enough material and sources to split Arquus into its own page. My only caveat is that it must be more than a copy-paste with an infobox plastered on, it needs some work and RS-gathering. Regards. --Urbanoc (talk) 11:36, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem on that front with regards to material needed to justify a split for an Arquus page. Don't know if I should do it. Damn job hunting. Ominae (talk) 05:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]