Talk:Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Sri Lanka Mid‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: United Nations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Many Issues

Neutrality , factual errors ,Original research , POV

Only positive side of the report has been shown.
No critisms even lot of critisms made against this report.
Also USA,India, .. voted to LLRC in the UNHRC. But this article reflect stands of these countries before UNHRC council in 2012 March.
Also content in the article has been writen as well proven facts. For that words like revealed,found has been used.
Most of the sentense are unreferenced. deaths of thousands of civilians, the displacement of more than 350,000

The Sri Lankan government reacted angrily to the panel's appointment,

Primary document (Report) or copy of the report has been used significantly to make the page. Wikipedia policy it needs secondary sources. Himesh84 17:57, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Already number of neutral editors involved on this subject, they never raised the issue. Panel is nothing to do with the LTTE or Sri Lankan Government or even Tamil Diaspora.Sudar123 (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly WP:POINT. I have tagged Ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka so Himesh84 has tagged this article and Sri Lankan Tamil people. Childish and unimaginative.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 15:38, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]