Talk:Republican Jewish Coalition

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: District of Columbia C‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Question[edit]

In March... what year?

"In March" of what year??? 1982? 2006? "In May" of what year??? 1885? 2226? Someone did a really poor job of not editing PR while copy and pasting. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.199.115.162 (talk) 06:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Paul?[edit]

The Ron Paul bit does not strike me as important enough to warrant its own section in this article, especially considering the brevity of other material. I'll think about how to fix it. --Beth C. 18:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I didn't put the NPOV tag on there. I have no idea who did or why. (???) --Beth C. 18:45, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Controversial" or "provocative"?[edit]

There is nothing controversial or provocative in the fact that Obama is (or was until very recently) linked (and pretty intimately) with Wright (not a distinguished friend of Jews to say the least), or in the suggestion that he shares some views with Buchanan (being anti-Israeli, for example, or at least coming from this area of thinking). And what is so "provocative" about "asking negative questions about Obama" in phone polls? I also see that the links in the references are pointing to political sites/blogs clearly biased to the left. This passage needs to be rephrased and toned down. First of all, it doesn't need to be titled "Controversy" but rather "Political activities during 2008 presidential election". And "controversial" or "provocative" also needs to be removed. "Harsh" - maybe, "uncompromising" - maybe, but not controversial at all. Not everything that Obama supporters dislike is "controversial". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.80.101.86 (talk) 17:29, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A list of Jews?[edit]

Why is there a list of Jews here? It makes no sense with the information provided. For eaxmple: Are they clearly in support of this coalition (which seems to be a formal organization)? There is no attribution. It seems to conflate people who are jewish, with those that choose to associate with this organization/movement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:FFC0:1D3:445C:1A68:B9D4:1A32 (talk) 13:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had the same reaction - information about Jewish-American politicians belongs elsewhere, for example at List of Jewish American politicians. I've removed the list (and images), since they are (at best) indirectly related to the organization, and per WP:NOT, Wikipedia isn't a directory or an indiscriminate collection of information. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 18:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Republican Jewish Coalition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Republican Jewish Coalition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061202120303/http://www.rjchq.org/News.asp?FormMode=Detail&ID=705 to http://www.rjchq.org/News.asp?Formmode=Detail&ID=705

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]