Talk:Retro style
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pickle Me Grandmother! This article sucks[edit]
What?? No mention of the current fad for retro music/TV/movies from the 1980's? Really??? This isn't 2005, "Retro" these days often refers to items made between the 50's and 90's that attract nostalgia. I would fix the article, But frankly, I can't be bothered; and somebody would probably revert the changes. Retro Agnostic (talk) 13:11, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- No doubt! But being Wiki, it fits right in...
File:Karlie Kloss at Anna Sui 2011.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Karlie Kloss at Anna Sui 2011.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 17 November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:46, 17 November 2011 (UTC) |
Where are the early 2000s considered retro?[edit]
"Early 2000s" has been added more than once to the opening paragraph but I think there needs to be a reference provided if we are going to say that. People generally consider that something needs to be at least fifteen years, maybe even older to be retro, the early 2000s of course are only thirteen years ago, at best. Unless there's a source, it shouldn't be in the opening paragraph.--210.48.190.33 (talk) 22:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
- C-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Arts
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Arts
- C-Class vital articles in Arts
- C-Class fashion articles
- Mid-importance fashion articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class Aesthetics articles
- Low-importance Aesthetics articles
- Aesthetics task force articles