Jump to content

Talk:Retroverted uterus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

lower back

[edit]

is it normal for your lower back to bother you with a tipped uterus??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.201.194.124 (talkcontribs)

  • I was only told that one is more likely to have back pain during labor. — Reinyday, 14:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

My tilted uterus

[edit]

So this guy told me that he thought I had a a really shallow pussy. I went to the doctor today and asked if she thought my vagina was unusually shallow. She said no but that I had a uterus that tilted backwards instead of forwards. Apparently this put my cervix at angle so that it's easier for a penis to reach part of it. She also said tilted uteruses (uteri?) are common, so I guess this guy had never encountered one. Anyhow, if anyone tells you you're a freak with a shallow pussy, don't listen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepilicious (talkcontribs)

haha

[edit]

I found this sentence on a website: "Generally, the majority of women suffering from a retroverted uterus experience no symptoms" http://www.womens-health.co.uk/retrover.asp —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepilicious (talkcontribs)

retrocession of uterus

[edit]

Retrocession of uterus should be posterior (backward) displacement of uterus, not anterior. Reference : http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Retrocession" Senaiboy 17:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

[edit]

It would be more useful for this article to have a picture of a retroverted uterus than a normal one. Perhaps somebody could find one that's free to use? 206.21.167.48 (talk) 20:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions

[edit]

Hi Rach1997, not sure if you planned on working with this article any more, but I've gone through and added some maintenance tags to help point out areas that still need work. This article has a lot of problems with uncited content, which is a serious problem for a medical article. This is also a pretty important article (>300 views every day), so any improvements you can make to the verifiability would be very welcome. Thanks, Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:14, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]