Talk:Return of Apollo 15 to Earth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments[edit]

"The loss of a parachute was of no consequence for the capsule, which was designed to land safely on just two parachutes. After splashing down the capsule stayed upright, which meant their recovery was not delayed while it righted itself. Frogmen from the Okinawa were at the capsule within minutes attaching a sea anchor and opening the hatch to get the crew into a life raft. Apollo 15 was the first mission where the crew did not go into quarantine in case of any lunar microorganisms."

^perhaps a reason for why no quarantining?

"They were flown to Hickam Air Force Base in Hawaii. From there they were flown along with the CM in a Lockheed JetStar to Ellington Air Force Base, Houston."

if "CM" is to mean Command Module, i have my doubts that it fit inside a JetStar, let alone if it fit inside one along with the crew. i could be wrong, so i didnt make any edits.

I've added a reason for no quarantining and removed the bit about the CM and the JetStar. Evil MonkeyHello 08:56, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: all articles moved as proposed. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 16:37, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]



– The current titles seem more fit for disaster movies than encyclopedia articles. I am open to other suggested destinations. RunningOnBrains(talk) 20:55, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]


  • Comment this is an improperly formatted multimove request. 70.24.248.211 (talk) 03:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Please let me know in what way it is incorrect so I may correct it. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 09:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Follow the instructions at WP:RM#Requesting multiple page moves where it tells you how to make a multiple move request. 70.24.248.211 (talk) 10:56, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Substituted correct template -RunningOnBrains(talk) 20:55, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -- I would prefer to see all the Apollo 15 articles merged, with their length being pruned to a suitable length for an encyclopedia article: it is intneded to be an article, not a small book! Peterkingiron (talk) 16:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. If we're considering merging, that's a different question and I think there might be some merit to it - but if we are going to have separate articles (or in the interim) I think the proposed new titles are much more appropriate and less stilted.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Return of Apollo 15 to Earth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]