Talk:Reverse factoring
 | The contents of the Reverse factoring page were merged into Supply chain finance on 13 September 2020 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Partnerfrance (talk) 19:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)This needs citations. Whilst my own research corroborates a lot of what is here, it needs thorough referencing because it's all currently unverified.
I am not aware of the fact that reverse factoring only provides partial payment. My experience is that they are fully paid without recourse. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjornes (talk • contribs) 14:19, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Gender[edit]
I "get" the idea that in order to make the article gender-neutral, the author has interspersed male and female pronouns on an "odd and even" basis, but shouldn't there be consistency when speaking of the same person? The article currently contains such howlers as "Because it is the ordering party that starts the process, it is her liability that is engaged and therefore the interest applied for the deduction is less than the one the supplier would have been given had he done it on her own." Surely that is not right?Partnerfrance (talk) 19:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Opening paragraph; accounting gobbledygook[edit]
This entry seems to have been lifted directly from an accounting text book rather than an encyclopaedic entry designed to explain a topic to a layperson. I have a good understanding of economics and worked in IT on accounting (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems, but this opening entry left my head spinning. No doubt the information is accurate, but hardly digestible to anyone outside the accounting field. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.190.207.108 (talk) 04:55, 11 August 2019 (UTC)