Talk:Revival of Kalarippayattu

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Revival of Kalarippayattu redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Kerala Mid‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Mid-importance).

Martial arts

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts articles

Merge proposal[edit]

The revival topic is simply not big enough to justify it having a seperate article, the info is good but if should be included in the main article. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 08:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad idea, since for a person new to this martial art, the article Revival of Kalarippayattu would not be of sepcific concern, and shall remain as an extra feature; hence it should be kept separate from the encyclopedic article about the martial art, Kalarippayattu, though it can be developed further. Merger to the main article:NO! (Ekabhishek (talk) 05:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

I think that 'revival' does not deserve to be a new article, it should mention as a seperate section in the main article. --Avinesh T 08:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The main article already has all the info from the revival article. They've pretty much been merged already, just delete the latter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.18.181 (talk) 08:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I had forgotten this, going to merge/redirect later this week unless there are objections. --Nate 14 81 12:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After going through the section i feel that both can be merged after some minor editing..Raamah (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]