Talk:Rhins of Galloway

Scotland Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

What is (are) Rhins?[edit]

What does Rhins mean? Are there more than one? Are there other places called The Rhins of... ? --AW 21:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone? --AW (talk) 20:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Maxwell in The Places Names of Galloway (Glasgow, 1930) p.234 gives 'Rhinns' as rionn, rinn, a point or promontory and quotes O'Brien's (?) Dictionary "It would take more than a whole sheet to mention all the neck-lands of Ireland whose name begins with this word rinn".

In Galloway (Stewartry of Kirkcubdright) there is a range of hills up to 2500 feet high called the Rhinns of Kells which run from Clatteringshaws Loch to Loch Doon, highest peak being Corserine (= cross-rhinn) 814 metres.

On Islay, which is also mentioned by Maxwell, there is (are?) the Rhinns of Islay, a penninsula on the north -west side of Loch Indaal. Alistairliv (talk) 17:32, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One n[edit]

This seems to have found its way back to two n's - despite the fact that that is not what it is called. The usage of two n's is historical, not contemporary - and all respectable geographical current sources use one n - including the OS, who are pretty much the authority on place names. Google searches with quotes yields ~7000 hits for one n and ~3000 for two - without quotes the ratio is even higher in favour of one n.