Talk:Rho Coronae Borealis
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Proposed merge 2014-09-06[edit]
I propose that the article Rho Coronae Borealis b is merged into this one. The object has consistently been found by astrometric measurements to be a low-mass star in a nearly face-on orbit (see Reffert & Quirrenbach (2011)), and is in fact no longer listed in the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia as a confirmed planet [1]. It therefore does not make sense to have an entire separate article dedicated to discussing this object as a planet, this misrepresents the current state of knowledge. As such I believe it should be merged into a section of this article: the Rho Coronae Borealis b article is not very long and the merge would not overwhelm this article, and it would make for a more consistent discussion about the nature of the companion. 77.57.25.250 (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- I've gone ahead and simply redirected the article here. Considering how outdated the article was, there wasn't even really anything useful to merge. StringTheory11 (t • c) 16:20, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Dubious[edit]
Abs. mag. is fainter than Sun, but luminosity is brighter (with comparable spectra). Also, abs. mag. is fainter than actual magnitude, for a star >10 parsec away. - ¡Ouch! (hurt me / more pain) 20:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Rho Coronae Borealis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090105162427/http://www.circumstellardisks.org/cgi-bin/refuted_frame.pl to http://circumstellardisks.org/cgi-bin/refuted_frame.pl
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Needs update[edit]
For some reason this article has never been updated with the results of Fulton et al. 2016. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Actually updated it now SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 22:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)