Talk:Rhombus of Michaelis

Anatomy: Gross Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Clearer Explanation?

The picture accompanying this article has a caption that reads: "This woman's Rhombus of Michaelis is visible just above her swimsuit." She is wearing a bikini though, and therefore it is hard to understand where exactly they are talking about. Perhaps if the picture had arrows pointing to the relevant location? Jalabi99 (talk) 07:44, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your description of the problem but not with your solution. I think it's better to use the correct term "bikini bottom". Let's not use arrows to deface the photo, it's absolutely the best part of this article ;) I'll change it right away instead of waiting for more comments since you wrote this a long time ago. AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 20:45, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Jalabi99. Without four arrows pointing at the four vertices of the rhombus, the picture provides very little help. See Dimples of Venus for how this can be done without defacing the photo. Also, this is an article about a medical term, and plenty of Wikipedia articles show nudity when it is necessary to explain a point -- this is an example where a picture without obstructive clothing would be a better idea. Again, see Dimples of Venus for an example. Duoduoduo (talk) 18:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added text defining the vertices of the rhombus. I will either replace the photo or annotate the existing photo with the vertices. The argument above ("not defacing the photo") is ridiculous. Arbalest Mike (talk) 18:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]