Talk:Ribblehead Viaduct

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ribblehead Viaduct article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Settle-Carlisle Line.

Civil engineering Mid‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Ribblehead Viaduct is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	February 15, 2019

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Bridges and Tunnels Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Scheduled monument[edit]

The NHLE listings for the viaduct and the camp didn't match so I checked with English Heritage and they have confirmed, and updated the entry, that the viaduct itself is not a scheduled monument but the land around the pier foundations is. Nthep (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for following it up with EH, and the much harder part of managing to get them to update their entry itself! —Sladen (talk) 21:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This was the latest of minor things I've brought up with them and to be fair they've always been pretty good about fixing errors. Nthep (talk) 21:18, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ribblehead Viaduct/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires inline references adding using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Add infobox, if one is available for viaducts
Add conversions to metric for remaining units
Sectionalise and expand on things like history

Keith D 17:29, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Has quite good structure and some in-line refs. added more. Good enough for a C. Not long, or detailed enough, for a B. Would benefit from having a more recent description of the repairs. Added a project. post-closure.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 06:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 06:56, 25 August 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 04:16, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

14 May 2020 edit[edit]

2A00:23C5:FC94:C400:C8C8:1241:9455:9E3A Regarding this edit; The Daily Mail is an unreliable source and the formatting was somewhat awry too. If you can find a reliable source, then please re-insert. Thanks. The joy of all things (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]