Talk:Ribes amarum
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Common name in the taxobox
[edit]
Regarding this edit, what is the rationale for not having a common name in the taxobox, when it already has the botanical name mentioned twice (albeit in two different forms)? I'm not for common named-titles at all, for any biota, just for having at least one in the taxobox. To my thinking, taxoboxen serve as a sort of summary of names (among other things) for someone looking for it quickly. And a common name is one of those names. For a reader looking for more information, deeper explanations are to be found in the text. Finally, I don't see any harm in having it there. |
|
|
OR... How about having it look like this one, here, instead. I've noticed a few plant pages are presented this way already. Hamamelis (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2010 (UTC)