Jump to content

Talk:Richard Dawkins/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Reassessment

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    This well written and follows the Wikipedia MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I added two requested citations. This article is well referenced to reliable sources and I can find no evidence of OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I have no hesitation in confirming that this article meets the Good Article criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]