Talk:Richard Harrow
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled[edit]
The article does not consist entirely of a plot summary. It is a bio of a fictional character. Makro (talk) 22:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
- It seems you still haven't read WP:ALLPLOT or WP:FICTION. A bio of a fictional character is a plot summary, any "in-universe" content is a plot summary. This isn't the Boardwalk Empire wikia, where articles can simply reiterate the plot, it must contain real-world information. That's what Wikipedia is. I'll repost what I had on my talk page about this: The article does not contain "all information that is possible"—where's the character summary for season 1, 2, 3, 4? How was the actor cast? Where's information about the design of the mask for the character? Is Richard Harrow based any specific person in history? What's been the critical reception to the character and actor? How about comments from Jack Huston about the development and writing of the character? That's how you write an article about a fictional character on Wikipedia. Same comment goes for Angela Darmody. Drovethrughosts (talk) 22:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
His mask[edit]
We have in relevant part
- Because of his appearance, Harrow wears a tin mask in public that was molded to mirror the intact right side of his face.
- He was badly disfigured during the war, losing his eye, upper jaw and most of the cheekbone on the left side of his face. He has also suffered some throat damage which causes him to speak in a low, muffled voice. Because of his appearance, Harrow wears a tin mask in public that was molded to mirror the intact right side of his face.
- A press article valuably supports much of that, but our 2nd ref is to a dead-link for a number of Daily Kos; is it clear whether Markos has already been approached about the possible publicity/good will (marketing) available from a WP-appropriate acknowledgement of open-archiving of the article we now cite with that dead link?
- "Molded" suggests to me not fine-tuning, but rather sculpture, whether faithful or not, and I didn't interrogate the article at all thoroughly to see if other wording would be suitable. I should have more to say on another day.
--Jerzy•t 05:34, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Boardwalkempire107.jpg[edit]
File:Boardwalkempire107.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.