Talk:Richard Hunt

Requested move

Richard Hunt (disambiguation) → Richard Hunt – There is no need for an unwieldy title when the parent article title is just a redirect to it. Jdcooper 15:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Voting

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~

support Jdcooper 15:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because below. Femto 15:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Never take a user the the wrong article. Vegaswikian 23:38, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wha? Femto 14:29, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

>> "people are more likely to link to Richard Hunt than the unwieldy disambig page"

People should never need link directly to a disambiguation page in the first place, no matter what's its name. The (disambiguation) qualifier is not mandatory, but it is descriptive and helps define the purpose of the page. Femto 15:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 08:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]