Talk:Richard Paulet, 17th Marquess of Winchester

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please check WP:POLITICIAN instead of WP:NOTABILITY if you assess the relevance of this article[edit]

User talk:Crusoe8181 incorrectly placed on 30 January 2013 the following box on my Talk page:

The article Richard Paulet, 17th Marquess of Winchester has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

titles do not establish notability; nothing in the article to pass WP:NOTABILITY

However, User:Necrothesp correctly removed this according to WP:POLITICIAN, because Richard Paulet was a "member of a national legislature". Thanks to both of you for following the appropriate procedures. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 20:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]