Talk:Richard Tomlinson/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: North8000 (talk · contribs) 01:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting a review of this article. North8000 (talk) 01:10, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review discussion[edit]

I noticed that the article has no images. Would adding one be do-able? I know these can be tough which is why I asked. North8000 (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still-open item. If it is not feasible to get an image then it would still meet that criteria, but we're need to discuss/find that out. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 11:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are no photos available that we can use.Farrtj (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Resolved. North8000 (talk) 15:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify the sentence : "MI6 have not succeeded in obtaining another PII certificate since the Tomlinson case, even though they have at times been subjected to more rigorous court scrutiny (for example the Inquest into the death of the Princess of Wales) than would have been involved with an employment tribunal." I really can't understand the "even though" linkage.North8000 (talk) 11:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed for clarity.Farrtj (talk) 21:37, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Resolved. North8000 (talk) 22:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Leigh, David reference link seems to go to the wrong place (an unrelated article). I found that when checking a statement of motive for making an offer to him; to save a step you might make sure that the source supports that. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 11:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not written by David Leigh but it's otherwise correct. Changed accordingly.Farrtj (talk) 10:38, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved. North8000 (talk) 12:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you clarify what "sat examinations" means in "Following his graduation he sat examinations". I'm afraid we can't understand that one on this side of the pond. I'm assuming that it means passed or took the examinations? North8000 (talk) 18:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It means took his examinations. I've now changed it to "took" so that it will be more widely understood. I wasn't aware that this was a British-ism.Farrtj (talk) 19:53, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Resolved. North8000 (talk) 20:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a conflict in the wording, and when checking to try to resolve it, I found that it appears that neither is sourced. The lead said that access to employment tribunals started in 2000, then body said it started in 2013. I did a quick check of the sources. The 2000 sources appears to (only) discuss a different type of tribunal (unrelated to employment) and the source for the 2013 figures appears to not even mention this. Could you clarify / fix? North8000 (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this is resolved. North8000 (talk) 10:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA criteria final checklist[edit]

Well-written

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Factually accurate and verifiable

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 12:43, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broad in its coverage

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 12:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each

Meets this criteria North8000 (talk) 12:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

Meets this criteria. North8000 (talk) 17:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrated, if possible, by images

Meets this criteria due to the "if possible" criteria. Has no images, appears that it is not possible to do so. North8000 (talk) 10:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Result[edit]

Congratulations. This has passed as a Wikipedia Good Article. Nice work! North8000 (talk) 11:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC) Reviewer[reply]