This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports Car Racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sports Car Racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sports Car RacingWikipedia:WikiProject Sports Car RacingTemplate:WikiProject Sports Car RacingSports Car Racing articles
The text of this article is almost completely unreadable. This is barely in English. If English is your second language and you don't have a firm grasp of it, how is this helpful to English Wikipedia? What good is an article of gibberish? The359 (Talk) 08:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest you read WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. Granted the article needs help and work, but making comments like the one above serves no constructive purpose. Additionally, the article is not close to gibberish, but rather needs a close eye to correct the issues. Rather than making grossly inaccurate comments, I would suggest you use the time to help the article rather than biting the newbie. reddogsix (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm well aware of both policies. It serves constructive purpose by telling someone that their contributions may be more harmful than they are helpful. How are any of my comments inaccurate? I'll ask again, what good is broken English on an English Wikipedia? Should I have to follow all of his edits around, which I already appear to have to do looking at his edit history, just to fix all the articles that have been hacked at? The359 (Talk) 18:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
