Talk:Rigveda Wiki

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2014 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Hanyang University/Collective Intelligence in Practice (2014)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

About Critic[edit]

I think it was very careful part of this article. It might be use the emotional expression. We need to more reference and talking about this.--Tmannya (talk) 08:30, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference[edit]

I had to put Rigveda wiki website itself to reference features and history as that is only availble source at this point.Db9023 (talk) 06:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did You Know[edit]

@Tmannya and Db9023: Let's try to get this featured at Wikipedia:Did You Know. I'll take crate of this, but you need to improve the quality of the language: too many sentences have grammatical errors. Please try to fix it by Friday. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Some English language sources[edit]

You may want to incorporate the following in the article, either as reference or external links:

[1]
[2]

--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Those two websites/wikis have quite old information. For examples, it mentions Monowiki as an Rigveda wiki engine which is no longer used. So I can't use these as a reference, but thanks a lot for your help. Db9023 (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Rigveda Wiki. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140517121541/http://mirror.enha.kr:80/wiki/FrontPage to http://mirror.enha.kr/wiki/FrontPage

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:01, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License controversies[edit]

Does someone know anything about the controversies on the license? I've just removed a sentence about a supposed change in the Namu Wiki license in June 2015 because [3] shows the same license as [4]. Is the issue that the original wiki didn't have a public license but later added one? Nemo 14:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]