Talk:Rikku/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk · contribs) 22:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
I'm driving by and just saw something: one of the sentences is unsourced.
While the voiceover work was being done,
the character had motion capture performed by
Miyuki Shimizu for Final Fantasy X and by
Natsuho Matsuda for Final Fantasy X-2.
I wonder if there's a reference for that. «Iias!:post□:,,.I» 02:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- As mentioned above, there's one sentence at the end of "Concept and Creation" section, the final sentence is not verified.
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Almost there. Same thing with the Terra Branford article, defininitely invest in choosing a consistent date format for refs.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 15:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Blue Pumpkin Pie: Ok I think I got them all! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Judgesurreal777: Now all that is left is the last sentence of Concept and Creation to be sourced, and i'll pass it.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 17:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- Good catch @Blue Pumpkin Pie:, unfortunately I have looked several times and have found no source for that, so I have removed it until a source is found. Now I think it’s done :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Judgesurreal777: Now all that is left is the last sentence of Concept and Creation to be sourced, and i'll pass it.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 17:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)