Talk:Ringerike Line/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
I will be reviewing this article. Canadakid2 (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Review by User:Lpangelrob[edit]
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- "made presidency over distance reductions." - probably not what the intended meaning was. "Took precedence", perhaps? Why is "more" italicized? A minor spacing issue in the final paragraph.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The first two paragraphs in History are uncited; I'm assuming they're related to current ref [12].
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The image in the infobox needs a caption in English - I don't know what it's saying otherwise.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall: