Talk:Ringmer

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Parliamentary constituency[edit]

Just which constituency is Ringmer in? The infobox shows Lewes, but actually points to Wealden (UK Parliament constituency). DuncanHill 12:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is Lewes, on the border of Wealden though.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.42.183.75 (talk) 15:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editorial notes[edit]

This article needs editing - I might get around to it once I have completed the Wealden District! - since it needs rewriting in line with [1] the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements. It lacks such a lot of the necessary entries/headings, and is really just a collection of disparate statements. Nothing about the churches, school, leisure etc ... There should also be a reference list - most of the External Links should be on that. Why do we have to talk about a non-existent railway? Peter Shearan (talk) 15:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ringmer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509102946/http://www.tbds.btinternet.co.uk/ringmercouncil/ to http://www.tbds.btinternet.co.uk/ringmercouncil/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:19, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]