Talk:Riot!/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Crushcrushcrush
It's not a single. If you disagree, please proove it.
there is a video for it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.245.20.57 (talk) 19:30, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Singles?
Has Hallelujah and Born For This been confirmed as singles yet, because I hadn't heard that and they're listed here. Hallelujah is at the bottom and Born For This is several places.
Hallelujah is going to be a single. it was listed on The Box.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.132.233 (talk) 18:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
One fan said that they heard that "We Are Broken" is going to be the next single, but I thought there wasn't supposed to be any more singles from Riot!? By the way I'm am a very big fan of Paramore.Parajunkie (talk) 21:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:PARARIOT22.JPG
Image:PARARIOT22.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
References
The references were a bit messed up, I'm not 100% confident about how to do references if I'm honest. Using the name tag under ref, I grouped repeating references together to try and neaten things up a bit, which I've seen done before. Also I don't think reference 12 is correct, it’s a copy of reference 11 and is therefore linking to the wrong chart page. Paulmcaleer (talk) 01:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)