Talk:Risen (2016 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Christianity: Jesus Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Jesus work group, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

This is not a "historical" drama[edit]

These story depicted in this movie (the search for the body) is purely fictional but built around an event that might have happened (the crucifixion). A historical event tells us simply tell about something that actually happened and is documented in history. The main characters, Clavius and Lucius are fictional persons and are not even mentioned in the bible. This "search" is not documented anywhere in history. What that effectively means is, aside from anyone’s personal beliefs about the biblical crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus, the entirety of Risen is fictional and should be treated as such.

Jwissick ^(t)^(c) 03:37, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of whether or not certain characters in a story are themselves, if a story revolves around historical characters, it can be characterized as an historical film. For example, see The Robe, which is pretty well suited for comparison. The term, historical film does not represent an affirming of the fiction or non-fiction aspect of the film. Take a look at Historical fiction. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Master Guns (talk) 01:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC) Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) Luke 16:31 “But he told him, ‘If they don’t listen to Moses and the prophets, they will not be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.’”[reply]

: wow! Then it must be true!! Jwissick ^(t)^(c) 11:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We plan to see the film in theatre today and will let you know. There is more than the details that are portrayed--there is also the 'feel' of the movie (if it is respectful to Bible believers or disrespectful.) At any rate, it can be asked in advance who is the movie for? The audience, the writer/critics, a Hollywood Oscar from peers? Who? We'll chip in here later. -- AstroU (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inspiration section[edit]

Hi Bill G7 - quoting the primary source of the book itself isn't valid. What you need are 3rd party sources which point out that this might be the inspiration for the film. Otherwise it's simply self-serving promotion on the book's part. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Caesar[edit]

The Caesar whose wrath is feared at the Resurrection would necessarily be Tiberius, not Augustus. Elizium23 (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]