Talk:River Works station

River Works station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 2, 2021. (Reviewed version).

A fact from River Works station appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 September 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that River Works station is only for the use of GE Aviation employees?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/River Works station.

Wikipedia

Greater Boston Public Transit High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Greater Boston Public Transit WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of public transportation in the Greater Boston metropolitan area. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Greater Boston Public TransitWikipedia:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitTemplate:WikiProject Greater Boston Public TransitGreater Boston Public Transit articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	March 1, 2019

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:River Works station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"to General Electric Aviation employees" isn't the company called "GE Aviation"?
- Done
"MassDOT, " expand before using this.
- Done
Lynn station is linked, but nothing for West Lynn?
- ? I'm not sure what you mean by this. Where?
"freight sidings" link?
- Done
"grade crossing" link?
- Done
"in 1837. By 1852" bit repetitive.
- Done Reworded.
You have several bold names, like G.E. Works but they don't all exist as redirects back to this article.
- Done Redirects created.
"Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn Railroad" it was "and" in the lead.
- Done
"railroad.[21][14]:77 " order.
- Done
"The River Works plant" overlinked.
- Done
"1952.[30][23][31]" order.
- Done
"timetables.[34][35][36][37] " likewise.
- Those appear to already be in order.
"seven daily inbound boardings in 1983, and 27 in 2018" 7/27 or seven/twenty-seven.
- Done
Is that reference really page 0?
- It's the inside front cover, what would be page 0 given the existing pagination. I can't think of a better way to indicate that with {{rp}}.
"schedules based on existing Saturday schedules were in effect from March 16 to June 23, 2020, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These schedules" schedules/schedules/schedules...
- Done Reworded.
"July 1, 2020–June 30, 2021" spaced en-dash.
- Done
"made accessible, with"
- ? Not sure what change you're suggesting here.
"with MassDOT in" again, spell it out.
- Done
Ref 46 could use an endash not a hyphen.
- Done

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 16:25, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the detailed review! I've addressed most of your comments, with clarification needed on a few. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the ?'s and can't see any problems! Promoting. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:08, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that River Works station is only for use by GE Aviation employees? Source: Boston Globe: "The trains only stop for employees of the nearby General Electric Co. aviation plant."
- ALT1:... that River Works station is the only private station on the MBTA Commuter Rail system? (same source: "It's the only station of its kind in the system...")

Reviewed: Actual play

Improved to Good Article status by Pi.1415926535 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:10, 2 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Looks good to me. New enough, long enough, well-written, well-sourced, QPQ is done, no copyvios, and hook is cited. jp×g 22:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ALT0 to T:DYK/P4