Talk:Roads in Victoria

Australia: Victoria / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Roads in Victoria is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Australian Roads: Victoria High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Victoria

Requested move

It was proposed below that List of Melbourne freeways be renamed and moved to List of freeways in Victoria. There was no consensus, instead it was moved to Freeways in Victoria--Henrygb 16:09, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the freeways mentioned in this article are also located in rural Victoria and not just Melbourne. – AxSkov (☏)

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~

Support. As per above. – AxSkov (☏) 08:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It's not a list, it's a full and proper article (that has a list) or at least could easily be extended to one; 'Victorian freeways' or 'Freeways in Victoria' would be better. —Felix the Cassowary (ɑe hɪː jɐ) 15:33, 9 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Add any additional comments

Cassowary's right that this is more of a proper article rather than a list, so I would also support a move to Freeways in Victoria. I prefer 'Freeways in Victoria' rather than 'Victorian freeways'. – AxSkov (☏) 05:39, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I added a bit of a picture, it's going to be taken away in 7 days though because I'm not sure of the copyright, but let me know what you think, I went to alot of trouble discovering those proposed freeways.

Oh and if anyone actually has a copy of or knows where to get the transportation plan or the freeway plans of 1969 I'd apreciate it alot. Thanks Nick carson 05:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Addition to Under Construction

Currently the Pakenham By-pass which links the Princess Freeway in Berwick to the Princess Freeway in Nar Nar Goon. This free way will by-pass Beaconsfield, Officer and Pakenham. Scheduled completion date is 2007/8. I will try to find out where the on/off ramps will be located.

--Blaab 08:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]