Talk:Rocket Fuel Inc.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 12:25, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The company name is Rocket Fuel but there is a redirect to rocket propellant. Thanks for the help. Lolo.shc1 (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "rocket fuel" is Rocket propellant regardless of capitalization. Shouldn't be treated as uncontroversial. --BDD (talk) 19:23, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Particularly as Rocket Fuel Inc. does not make rocket fuel or any other factory-type product. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:14, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Slight oppose--it seems that this company wouldn't have primary topic. Red Slash 01:45, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. As the primary topic, Rocket Fuel should still redirect to Rocket propellant. Most people seem likely to search for that, regardless of what capitalization they may enter by mistake. Page view stats barely make 50 a day. Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Written by PR

Another article on Wikipedia is written by the company's PR department. Anybody mind if I put it in perspective? Chisme (talk) 15:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]